Coin Collecting

Mintmarks and How to Spot a Removed S — Wear Patterns vs Tooling Marks Under 10x

Mintmarks and How to Spot a Removed S — Wear Patterns vs Tooling Marks Under 10x

No-S proof coins are genuine, valuable mint errors. Altered coins with their S filed off look similar at a glance — until you get a loupe on them. Here's what to look for.

A genuine No-S proof coin can be worth thousands of dollars. A coin with its S mintmark filed off is worth face value. Under a naked eye, both look like a proof coin with no mintmark. Under a 10x loupe, they tell completely different stories — if you know where to look and what you're comparing against.

This article covers how mintmarks are produced, which No-S varieties actually exist and why, and the specific diagnostic signs that distinguish a genuine mint error from an altered coin. We're focusing on the United States proof series from the 1960s through 1990s, where the most valuable No-S errors occur and where the most counterfeiting pressure exists.

How Mintmarks Are Produced

Understanding why a genuine No-S looks different from a removed S requires understanding how mintmarks get onto coins in the first place. The process changed significantly in 1990, and the change matters for authentication.

Hand-Punched Mintmarks (Pre-1990)

Before 1990, mintmarks were added to working dies individually by hand. A mintmark punch — a steel tool with the letter in relief — was hammered into the working die's field. This process was done one die at a time, after the hub design had been impressed but before the die was hardened.

Hand punching introduced natural variation: mintmarks could be off-center, tilted, weakly struck, doubled (if the punch slipped), or accidentally omitted. The 1990 date is the relevant threshold — if a coin was struck before that year, any No-S proof could plausibly result from a die that was accidentally sent to the press without having its S applied.

Hub-Punched Mintmarks (1990 and After)

From 1990 onward, mintmarks were added to the master die (or hub) rather than to individual working dies. This means every working die made from that hub carries the mintmark, and genuine No-S errors became essentially impossible for modern-era coins. Authentication questions about No-S proof coins almost exclusively involve coins dated before 1990.

The No-S Proof Series: Which Coins Actually Exist

Several genuine No-S proof varieties are recognized in standard catalogs. The most well-known:

CoinYear(s)Estimated Surviving PopulationApproximate Value (Fine-Proof)
Lincoln cent, No S1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1983Varies; 1983 ~100 known$500–$15,000+ depending on year and grade
Roosevelt dime, No S1968, 1970, 1975, 1983Varies; 1975 ~2 known$500–$10,000+
Jefferson nickel, No S1971, 1983Varies$500–$3,500+
Washington quarter, No S1970~36 known$10,000–$30,000+

Values are approximate and fluctuate with market conditions. The 1975 Roosevelt No-S dime is particularly rare — only two have been authenticated — making any purported example highly suspicious. The 1983 Lincoln No-S cent, with roughly 100 specimens known, is the most commonly encountered.

Authentication rule: Any No-S proof coin of significant value should be submitted to PCGS or NGC before purchase. The population report tells you how many have been authenticated. If someone is offering an "ungraded" 1975 No-S Roosevelt dime, the probability that it's an altered coin is essentially 100%.

What a Genuine No-S Looks Like Under 10x

The field of a coin is the flat background area between the raised design elements. On a proof coin, the field is mirror-polished to a high reflective sheen by the polished die surface. On a genuine No-S coin, the field in the mintmark area looks exactly like the rest of the field:

In essence, the genuine No-S coin looks like a proof coin that never had a mintmark. The die it was struck from never received a punch, so there is no evidence of a mintmark in the die surface and therefore none in the coin surface.

What a Removed S Looks Like Under 10x

Removing a mintmark from a coin requires physically altering the coin's surface. Metal must be removed from the field in the area of the S. No matter how carefully done, this leaves diagnostic traces that a 10x loupe reveals.

Tooling and Filing Marks

The most common removal method is filing or polishing the field with abrasives. Under magnification this produces:

Recessed or Raised Areas

Removing metal creates a depression in the field (or, if poorly done with a graver, raised burrs). On genuine No-S coins, the field is flat and continuous at the level of the original die surface. On a removed-S coin:

Ghost Image of the Letter

Even after competent removal work, the base metal in the area where the mintmark was struck is work-hardened differently from the surrounding field. The S punch compressed the metal grain structure. After removal and re-polishing, that area may still reflect light at a fractionally different angle, leaving a faint ghost of the letter visible under specific lighting conditions. This is one of the most reliable authentication signs and requires only a 10x loupe and a good light source.

The Raking Light Technique

Most collectors examine coins under overhead light, which minimizes the visibility of surface alterations. Graders and authenticators use raking light: hold the light source (a small flashlight or a focused lamp) nearly parallel to the coin's surface, at a low angle of perhaps 5–15 degrees from the plane of the coin.

Under raking light, any disturbance in the mirror field becomes dramatically visible. The genuine No-S field is featureless in the mintmark zone — just clean metal. A removed S reveals itself as a region of different texture, with the scratches, ghost impressions, or flatness changes jumping out in sharp relief.

Practice this technique on common coins first. Examine a known good 1970-S proof cent under raking light and see what the S looks like — the raised letter's base meeting the field, the die-polish around it. Then examine a circulated coin with the same date and look at wear patterns. The wear on genuine circulated coins occurs on high points first (portrait, design relief) and does not touch the field; an altered proof field will show alteration regardless of where the design wear falls.

Other Mintmark Alteration Types

Removed S is one of two directions of mintmark fraud. Added mintmarks are the other:

Added Mintmarks

A common coin (say, a 1916-P Mercury dime) gets an S or D added to simulate a rare variety (the 1916-D is one of the most valuable Mercury dimes). Added marks are applied by soldering, gluing, or laser-welding a miniature S onto the field. Under 10x:

Mintmark Repositioning

A rarer and more sophisticated alteration: the original mintmark is removed and a different mintmark is added (e.g., D replaced with S to simulate a more valuable variety). This combines both types of alteration evidence — the field shows removal marks, and the new mark shows addition evidence.

Reference Tools for Authentication

You cannot authenticate a potential No-S coin in isolation. You need comparison data:

If you believe you've found a genuine No-S proof, the most valuable step is immediate submission to PCGS or NGC before attempting to sell or even show the coin extensively. Handling, cleaning, or storing improperly can reduce value significantly. Submit in the original proof packaging if you have it; inclusion with original government packaging increases confidence and value.

Practical rule of thumb: If a coin's value depends entirely on the absence of a mintmark, treat it as suspect until professionally attributed. The economics of counterfeiting mean that No-S fakes exist in proportion to the value of the genuine article. The 1975 No-S Roosevelt dime is worth so much that fakes are numerous; the 1971 No-S nickel, worth somewhat less, has fewer fakes. Population matters: if only 2 genuine specimens are known and you've found one, the probability that it's genuine is very low unless you can trace its provenance.
Plain note about money. The gear tiles below link to eBay with an affiliate tag. Commission pays for the site. Your price is the same either way.

Coin authentication tools worth buying

What you need to do what this article describes. Full disclosure.

← back to coin-collecting

Can't find what you want?

Suggest a niche, calculator, or article. We read every submission — the operator picks one a week to turn into a real page.